Omg it's really cool to hear that, I love Bean lol. I would love to see it return at some point, but since I'm a game developer I've also been considering making some sort of spiritual successor to it as a future project in case it doesn't. Glad you like the blog too! :D]]>fitsoab wrote: Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:19 am Seeing Bean Dreams again is amazing. I ALSO played that game when I was super young, and the side of me that loves bouncy, colorful worlds just fell in love. Probably the most fun I'd ever had with a mobile game, really bringing a whole layer of dimensions with its simplistic controls. I tried to 100% that game back when I first had it, and I was seriously bummed when I saw it had vanished from the App Store a few years later. Seeing a response to it now brings me a lot of joy. I really hope I get to see Bean Dreams and Bean's Quest again, it will absolutely make my whole year... Love this blog!!!
Omg it's really cool to hear that, I love Bean lol. I would love to see it return at some point, but since I'm a game developer I've also been considering making some sort of spiritual successor to it as a future project in case it doesn't. Glad you like the blog too! :D]]>fitsoab wrote: Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:19 am Seeing Bean Dreams again is amazing. I ALSO played that game when I was super young, and the side of me that loves bouncy, colorful worlds just fell in love. Probably the most fun I'd ever had with a mobile game, really bringing a whole layer of dimensions with its simplistic controls. I tried to 100% that game back when I first had it, and I was seriously bummed when I saw it had vanished from the App Store a few years later. Seeing a response to it now brings me a lot of joy. I really hope I get to see Bean Dreams and Bean's Quest again, it will absolutely make my whole year... Love this blog!!!
I just installed Mint on an 10+ year old laptop of mine. Having fun with it so far even if the computer's slightly laggy from how old it is.rejectconvenience wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2024 9:28 am That's not true, I use pop_os, but what's your favorite distro?![]()
I just installed Mint on an 10+ year old laptop of mine. Having fun with it so far even if the computer's slightly laggy from how old it is.rejectconvenience wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2024 9:28 am That's not true, I use pop_os, but what's your favorite distro?![]()
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
This is also not the case with the Proof or Work test that Anubis Presents, as Computers are the only ones that can preform the Calculations in a timely manner.Mæstro wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2025 10:21 am ‘a program that protects websites against bots by generating and grading tests that humans can pass but current computer programs cannot.’
This is also not the case with the Proof or Work test that Anubis Presents, as Computers are the only ones that can preform the Calculations in a timely manner.Mæstro wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2025 10:21 am ‘a program that protects websites against bots by generating and grading tests that humans can pass but current computer programs cannot.’
I think this is false, for Anubis itself and its official documentation state otherwise. Anubis’ official instance introduces itself to users as ‘making sure you’re not a bot’, as shown in the attached screenshot. The readme describes Anubis as a firewall and an alternative to Cloudflare, an unambiguous captcha (where ticking a box is the challenge), which is why I had brought it up in the first place. The developer’s explanation states that Anubis is intended to block scrapers, although it does so by testing features.Crazyroostereye wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:23 am Anubis doesn't [determine if a Connection is from a Human or a Bot], nor it tries to determine if a Connection is Human or Bot.
This is literally true, and when I spoke of vagueness in my post, this is what I had in mind. Anubis says on the official instance if cookies are blocked that it ‘requires cookies [for] making sure you are a valid client’. ‘Client’ can refer just as well to the end user himself or the computer which he uses to access the server. The user, not the computer, is reading the message, but Anubis tests the computer itself. None of the definitions I have found are pedantic enough to bother splitting this hair, so neither do I.]Computers are the only ones that can preform the Calculations in a timely manner.
It is true, from the the developer’s comments, that Anubis uses the same technology, that also in Hashcash, which is used (among other things) for punishing spambots, but from the above documentation, Anubis infers from the results whether to deny bot networks access. The readme also mentions that legitimate web crawlers will fail to index sites wielding Anubis, which would not happen if it only tolled the user’s processor like some antispam measures.The way Anubis works is by making Hard to Compute calculation that the Computer has to preform, which its intent is to increase the Computing bill of Bot Networks that access the Website frequently.
Attachments
I think this is false, for Anubis itself and its official documentation state otherwise. Anubis’ official instance introduces itself to users as ‘making sure you’re not a bot’, as shown in the attached screenshot. The readme describes Anubis as a firewall and an alternative to Cloudflare, an unambiguous captcha (where ticking a box is the challenge), which is why I had brought it up in the first place. The developer’s explanation states that Anubis is intended to block scrapers, although it does so by testing features.Crazyroostereye wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:23 am Anubis doesn't [determine if a Connection is from a Human or a Bot], nor it tries to determine if a Connection is Human or Bot.
This is literally true, and when I spoke of vagueness in my post, this is what I had in mind. Anubis says on the official instance if cookies are blocked that it ‘requires cookies [for] making sure you are a valid client’. ‘Client’ can refer just as well to the end user himself or the computer which he uses to access the server. The user, not the computer, is reading the message, but Anubis tests the computer itself. None of the definitions I have found are pedantic enough to bother splitting this hair, so neither do I.]Computers are the only ones that can preform the Calculations in a timely manner.
It is true, from the the developer’s comments, that Anubis uses the same technology, that also in Hashcash, which is used (among other things) for punishing spambots, but from the above documentation, Anubis infers from the results whether to deny bot networks access. The readme also mentions that legitimate web crawlers will fail to index sites wielding Anubis, which would not happen if it only tolled the user’s processor like some antispam measures.The way Anubis works is by making Hard to Compute calculation that the Computer has to preform, which its intent is to increase the Computing bill of Bot Networks that access the Website frequently.
Attachments
I prefer to speak of necessary or sufficient conditions for events than causes. (My formal background in pure mathematics is showing here.) Your wish to avoid needless surveillance does not suffice on its own to introduce friction. It is also necessary that they do not switch for there to be any, and there are further conditions which (they believe) suffice for them to refuse to switch.In the back of my mind I have the sneaking suspicion that if I just texted people that I would not be having these problems. In effect there is friction in maintaining a relationship with me just because I'm using another app.
As my own commentary on escaping Discord shows, I know how it is, even if my case is far milder than yours. (As an aside, I hope to update this community on my progress in about a week.)That's sad for me because all I'm trying to do is use something that's a little more private… It's frustrating to have basic pathways to connection be locked behind exploitative gates while the people who are inside could leave at any time.
To be clear, you are not making your own problems worse by seeking that others respect your human rights. Rather, you are trying to mend a grave problem you already suffer. You are acting neither in malice nor negligence towards yourself or others. How, then, can you be blamed?]]>I'm a little upset to feel like I am exacerbating my own problem just because I don't want a company or the government to be able to listen to my every conversation.
I prefer to speak of necessary or sufficient conditions for events than causes. (My formal background in pure mathematics is showing here.) Your wish to avoid needless surveillance does not suffice on its own to introduce friction. It is also necessary that they do not switch for there to be any, and there are further conditions which (they believe) suffice for them to refuse to switch.In the back of my mind I have the sneaking suspicion that if I just texted people that I would not be having these problems. In effect there is friction in maintaining a relationship with me just because I'm using another app.
As my own commentary on escaping Discord shows, I know how it is, even if my case is far milder than yours. (As an aside, I hope to update this community on my progress in about a week.)That's sad for me because all I'm trying to do is use something that's a little more private… It's frustrating to have basic pathways to connection be locked behind exploitative gates while the people who are inside could leave at any time.
To be clear, you are not making your own problems worse by seeking that others respect your human rights. Rather, you are trying to mend a grave problem you already suffer. You are acting neither in malice nor negligence towards yourself or others. How, then, can you be blamed?]]>I'm a little upset to feel like I am exacerbating my own problem just because I don't want a company or the government to be able to listen to my every conversation.
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments