I have seen the Fairphones around, my personal experience isn't that great. The Phones given they're Price class are usually just that much worse which is huge turndown, but I could be wrong nowadays my experience is from the Fairphone 3. Also, there were supply Issues with replacement parts when my Sister owned one.loebas wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 2:52 pm i want to go for a Fairphone 5 since these are highly repairable
I have seen the Fairphones around, my personal experience isn't that great. The Phones given they're Price class are usually just that much worse which is huge turndown, but I could be wrong nowadays my experience is from the Fairphone 3. Also, there were supply Issues with replacement parts when my Sister owned one.loebas wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 2:52 pm i want to go for a Fairphone 5 since these are highly repairable
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
i haven't played it in a long time myself, so i'm not familiar with the different editions. the idea is that you're playing as enforcers in a far future, comedic, dystopian setting. imagine the setting and situations of the SCP Foundation, but it's directed by Mel Brooks. lots of dying in hilarious ways, fighting mutant cyborgs, and arguing with Kafkaesque bureaucracy. a very silly game, and lots of fun if it's your jam.pingaspostal wrote: Thu May 15, 2025 2:55 am i don't mind "necroposting" (in fact i don't understand why it'd be a bad thing at all...?) any noteworthy differences between editions? would you mind giving me a summary of the game too? i know i could theoretically google it but i like hearing it from a human being
i haven't played it in a long time myself, so i'm not familiar with the different editions. the idea is that you're playing as enforcers in a far future, comedic, dystopian setting. imagine the setting and situations of the SCP Foundation, but it's directed by Mel Brooks. lots of dying in hilarious ways, fighting mutant cyborgs, and arguing with Kafkaesque bureaucracy. a very silly game, and lots of fun if it's your jam.pingaspostal wrote: Thu May 15, 2025 2:55 am i don't mind "necroposting" (in fact i don't understand why it'd be a bad thing at all...?) any noteworthy differences between editions? would you mind giving me a summary of the game too? i know i could theoretically google it but i like hearing it from a human being
Attachments
Attachments
Honestly I don't carry much malice against Chromium, it is going the way of Android. Where more and more Features are added in Proprietary Blobs that make the Browser Functional which sucks. But my Issue lies actually more in the Monopoly in the Blink Engine and to the extent Chromium. Where there won't be any other Option then using Google's thing which is semi Open Source or Apples thing which will be equally shit. Basically what the Mobile Operating System Land Scape is looking like right now.]]>Cobra! wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 6:18 pm Honestly, the fact Brave is Chrome-based was enough of a red-flag for me.
Honestly I don't carry much malice against Chromium, it is going the way of Android. Where more and more Features are added in Proprietary Blobs that make the Browser Functional which sucks. But my Issue lies actually more in the Monopoly in the Blink Engine and to the extent Chromium. Where there won't be any other Option then using Google's thing which is semi Open Source or Apples thing which will be equally shit. Basically what the Mobile Operating System Land Scape is looking like right now.]]>Cobra! wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 6:18 pm Honestly, the fact Brave is Chrome-based was enough of a red-flag for me.
I tend to use the Default as a good measure. As you can make most Browsers really good when changing the settings. Ignoring that finding them can often be a Pain.]]>
I tend to use the Default as a good measure. As you can make most Browsers really good when changing the settings. Ignoring that finding them can often be a Pain.]]>
Primarily I am referring to their Data Storage Default. They dont store Cookies at all, which as my Primary Browser can be annoying (It can be changed in the Settings, as most things can). I get the Security Reasons but contrair to this forumDedRoll wrote: Mon Mar 31, 2025 5:03 pm Could you explain it more about LibreWolf going overboard? I plan to move to that browser or maybe i use Zen too if it's better comparison than LibreWolf
Primarily I am referring to their Data Storage Default. They dont store Cookies at all, which as my Primary Browser can be annoying (It can be changed in the Settings, as most things can). I get the Security Reasons but contrair to this forumDedRoll wrote: Mon Mar 31, 2025 5:03 pm Could you explain it more about LibreWolf going overboard? I plan to move to that browser or maybe i use Zen too if it's better comparison than LibreWolf
Attachments
Attachments
C418 recently made the music for the game Wanderstop, https://youtu.be/zKBgeJziLsURain wrote: Fri May 30, 2025 6:18 pm The Minecraft soundtracks, oddly enough. I was never a huge Minecraft player or anything, I was initially into Boards of Canada and eventually discovered C418 since they both have a similar ambient-ish vibe. Volume Beta is still one of my favorite albums to this day.
C418 recently made the music for the game Wanderstop, https://youtu.be/zKBgeJziLsURain wrote: Fri May 30, 2025 6:18 pm The Minecraft soundtracks, oddly enough. I was never a huge Minecraft player or anything, I was initially into Boards of Canada and eventually discovered C418 since they both have a similar ambient-ish vibe. Volume Beta is still one of my favorite albums to this day.
Code: Select all
_
\`\
|= |
/- ;.---.
_ __.' (____)
` (_____)
_' ._ .' (____)
` (___)
jgs --`'------'`
Code: Select all
_
\`\
|= |
/- ;.---.
_ __.' (____)
` (_____)
_' ._ .' (____)
` (___)
jgs --`'------'`
Attachments
Attachments
What's your usecase? Just being able to stream things to friends? Tabletop gaming?Rain wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:31 pm Discord, specifically for low-latency live streaming. I still haven't found any good alternatives that let me stream my desktop audio and video in real time on Linux.
What's your usecase? Just being able to stream things to friends? Tabletop gaming?Rain wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:31 pm Discord, specifically for low-latency live streaming. I still haven't found any good alternatives that let me stream my desktop audio and video in real time on Linux.
Mostly streaming video games with friends. We usually talk over Signal but the screen share was choppy and the audio didn't seem to come through, same thing with other video conferencing software we tried (Jitsi, Matrix). We also considered PeerTube for general live streaming but the latency isn't ideal for games where you need to react quickly.Mark wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:47 pmWhat's your usecase? Just being able to stream things to friends? Tabletop gaming?Rain wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:31 pm Discord, specifically for low-latency live streaming. I still haven't found any good alternatives that let me stream my desktop audio and video in real time on Linux.
Mostly streaming video games with friends. We usually talk over Signal but the screen share was choppy and the audio didn't seem to come through, same thing with other video conferencing software we tried (Jitsi, Matrix). We also considered PeerTube for general live streaming but the latency isn't ideal for games where you need to react quickly.Mark wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:47 pmWhat's your usecase? Just being able to stream things to friends? Tabletop gaming?Rain wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:31 pm Discord, specifically for low-latency live streaming. I still haven't found any good alternatives that let me stream my desktop audio and video in real time on Linux.
Yeah one of the problems with streaming is that there's a lot of secret sauces that go into it, from encoding/decoding, choosing the right bitrates, and often in the case of Discord and other big names like Twitch in particular, you'll have transcoding which takes the stream and re-encodes it into more efficient and low-latency stream options (that's why you can choose what quality to watch when you watch a stream). When you go direct from A to C without taking a stop in the middle, the software basically has to trust that you are able to send that signal fast enough and without performance issues, and that the person receiving it can also handle receiving what you're sending. Then, if you're sending that to more than one person, you're having to take quite a performance hit to transmit that data that many times over, which is also what having infrastructure in the middle handles. It's also why streaming is actually stupid expensive (Twitch which is owned by Amazon, uses Amazon infrastructure like IVS to do it. You can actually see what it would cost if you did that yourself https://ivs.rocks/calculator ). All of that said, you have to find the right alternative that fits your needs, and that is pretty hard to do, particularly for free. Discord is an odd one out because it lets you do it for free. There might be some lower-cost options that might work but most lower-cost options aren't made for low-latency/high bit-rate that gaming typically needs to look "good" (Zoom for example probably won't do great).Rain wrote: Sun Jun 01, 2025 12:10 amMostly streaming video games with friends. We usually talk over Signal but the screen share was choppy and the audio didn't seem to come through, same thing with other video conferencing software we tried (Jitsi, Matrix). We also considered PeerTube for general live streaming but the latency isn't ideal for games where you need to react quickly.Mark wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:47 pm
What's your usecase? Just being able to stream things to friends? Tabletop gaming?
Yeah one of the problems with streaming is that there's a lot of secret sauces that go into it, from encoding/decoding, choosing the right bitrates, and often in the case of Discord and other big names like Twitch in particular, you'll have transcoding which takes the stream and re-encodes it into more efficient and low-latency stream options (that's why you can choose what quality to watch when you watch a stream). When you go direct from A to C without taking a stop in the middle, the software basically has to trust that you are able to send that signal fast enough and without performance issues, and that the person receiving it can also handle receiving what you're sending. Then, if you're sending that to more than one person, you're having to take quite a performance hit to transmit that data that many times over, which is also what having infrastructure in the middle handles. It's also why streaming is actually stupid expensive (Twitch which is owned by Amazon, uses Amazon infrastructure like IVS to do it. You can actually see what it would cost if you did that yourself https://ivs.rocks/calculator ). All of that said, you have to find the right alternative that fits your needs, and that is pretty hard to do, particularly for free. Discord is an odd one out because it lets you do it for free. There might be some lower-cost options that might work but most lower-cost options aren't made for low-latency/high bit-rate that gaming typically needs to look "good" (Zoom for example probably won't do great).Rain wrote: Sun Jun 01, 2025 12:10 amMostly streaming video games with friends. We usually talk over Signal but the screen share was choppy and the audio didn't seem to come through, same thing with other video conferencing software we tried (Jitsi, Matrix). We also considered PeerTube for general live streaming but the latency isn't ideal for games where you need to react quickly.Mark wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 6:47 pm
What's your usecase? Just being able to stream things to friends? Tabletop gaming?